4.5 Article

Two genes conferring resistance to Pythium stalk rot in maize inbred line Qi319

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND GENOMICS
卷 290, 期 4, 页码 1543-1549

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00438-015-1019-5

关键词

Qi319; Molecular mapping; Stalk rot; RpiQI319 genes

资金

  1. China Agriculture Research System (Maize) from the Ministry of Agriculture of China [CARS-02]
  2. Public Welfare Special Fund from Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2060302-2-13]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program from Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stalk rots are destructive diseases in maize around the world, and are most often caused by the pathogen Pythium, Fusarium and other fungi. The most efficient management for controlling stalk rots is to breed resistant cultivars. Pythium stalk rot can cause serious yield loss on maize, and to find the resistance genes from the existing germplasm is the basis to develop Pythium-resistance hybrid lines. In this study, we investigated the genetic resistance to Pythium stalk rot in inbred line Qi319 using F-2 and F-2:3 population, and found that the resistance to Pythium inflatum in Qi319 was conferred by two independently inherited dominant genes, RpiQI319-1 and RpiQI319-2. Linkage analysis uncovered that the RpiQI319-1 co-segregated with markers bnlg1203, and bnlg2057 on chromosome 1, and that the RpiQI319-2 locus co-segregated with markers umc2069 and bnlg1716 on chromosome 10. The RpiQI319-1 locus was further mapped into a similar to 500-kb interval flanked by markers SSRZ33 and SSRZ47. These results will facilitate marker-assisted selection of Pythium stalk rot-resistant cultivars in maize breeding. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the resistance to P. inflatum in the inbred line Qi319, and is also the first description of two independently inherited dominant genes conferring the resistance of Pythium stalk rot in maize.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据