4.3 Article

Vitamin D levels: its relationship to bone mineral density response and disease activity in premenopausal Malaysian systemic lupus erythematosus patients on corticosteroids

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1756-185X.2011.01653.x

关键词

bone mineral density; corticosteroids; disease activity; systemic lupus erythematosus; treatment response; vitamin D

资金

  1. Merck & Co, Inc., Whitehouse Station, USA
  2. Roche (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To determine if baseline vitamin D levels would influence the gain in bone mineral density (BMD) in female systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients on corticosteroids (CS) taking bone-active medication. Method: Premenopausal SLE patients participating in a trial assessing the efficacy of calcium alone, calcitriol and calcium, and alendronate and calcium, on BMD in patients on CS, were studied. Patients were randomly allocated to the treatment groups at the start of the study and followed up for 2 years. Serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D [ 25(OH) D] was measured at baseline. Results: Thirty-eight patients were studied. One (2%) patient had osteoporosis, nine (24%) had osteopenia and all others had normal BMD. The mean baseline 25(OH) D levels were 21.6 +/- 4.6 ng/ mL (+/- 1 SD). Twelve (32%) patients had vitamin D deficiency [ 25(OH) D < 20 ng/ mL]. There was a significant negative correlation between SLEDAI scores and 25(OH) D levels, that is, patients with high SLEDAI scores had significantly lower 25(OH) D levels (P = 0.033). Left femoral neck BMD was significantly lower in the deficient compared to insufficient group (P = 0.042). There was a trend toward better BMD gain at 2 years in the vitamin D insufficient compared to the deficient group, which did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: This study showed that in female SLE patients, low vitamin D levels are associated with higher disease activity and suggests that patients who have higher vitamin D levels have a better BMD response during treatment with bone-active agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据