4.6 Review

Recent progress on high wind-speed retrieval from multi-polarization SAR imagery: a review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 35, 期 11-12, 页码 4031-4045

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2014.916451

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese National High Technology Research and Development (863) Programme [2013AA09A505]
  2. Natural Science Youth Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012467]
  3. Natural Science State Key Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011008]
  4. National Natural Science Youth Foundation of China [41206171]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41176160]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Tropical Oceanography
  7. South China Sea Institute of Oceanology
  8. Chinese Academy of Sciences [LTO1206]
  9. Scientific Research Foundation of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology [S8111003001]
  10. Priority Academic Programme Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  11. Canadian Space Agency GRIP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) is a useful instrument for monitoring typhoons, hurricanes, and tropical cyclones from space. In this article, we summarize high wind-speed retrieval and validation methods for multi-polarization SAR. Compared to co-polarized geophysical model functions, we show that a cross-polarized wind-speed retrieval model is potentially able to estimate wind speed under extreme weather conditions. The resulting wind speeds are validated using in situ buoy observations, and airborne Stepped-Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) and spaceborne scatterometer measurements, as well as the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Hurricane Research Division's Hurricane Wind Analysis System (H*Wind) data. We also analyse the effect of intense rainfall on SAR-derived winds. The wind-speed retrieval accuracy can be improved in cases where the normalized radar cross sections (NRCSs) are suitably modified in rainfall areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据