4.6 Article

Filling the white ribbon' - a multisource seamless digital elevation model for Lizard Island, northern Great Barrier Reef

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 34, 期 18, 页码 6337-6354

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2013.800659

关键词

-

资金

  1. ARC SuperScience Fellowship
  2. UQ
  3. Lizard Island Research Station Fellowship
  4. UOW University Research Committee 'Near-Miss' grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrographers have traditionally referred to the nearshore area as the white ribbon' area due to the challenges associated with the collection of elevation data (elevation hereafter refers to both topography and bathymetry) in this highly dynamic transitional zone between terrestrial and marine environments. Accordingly, available information in this zone is typically characterized by a range of data sets from disparate sources. In this article, we propose a framework to fill the white ribbon area of a coral reef system by integrating multiple elevation data sets acquired by a suite of remote-sensing technologies into a seamless digital elevation model (DEM). A range of data sets are integrated, including field-collected global positioning system (GPS) elevation points, topographic and bathymetric light detecting and ranging (lidar), single and multibeam echosoundings, nautical charts, and bathymetry derived from optical remote-sensing imagery. The proposed framework ranks data reliability internally, thereby avoiding the requirements to quantify absolute error and results in a high-resolution, seamless product. Nested within this approach is an effective spatially explicit technique for improving the accuracy of bathymetry estimates derived empirically from optical satellite imagery through modelling the spatial structure of residuals. The approach was applied to data collected on and around Lizard Island in northern Australia. Collectively, the framework holds promise for filling the white ribbon zone in coastal areas characterized by similar data availability scenarios.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据