4.6 Article

A physical explanation of the variation in threshold for delineating terrestrial water surfaces from multi-temporal images: effects of radiometric correction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 33, 期 18, 页码 5862-5875

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.675452

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 Programme of National Basic Research Programme of China [2012CB417003]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [41171272]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-temporal satellite images are widely used to delineate objects of interest for monitoring surface changes. Threshold value(s) are often determined from a histogram of a delineation index. However, the threshold determined may vary and be case-dependent, with images taken at different times. Although the variation is well known, its cause remains unclear, and this raises doubts about the reliability of the classification results. This study selects three widely used indices, the near-infrared (NIR) band, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the normalized difference water index (NDWI), all of which can be used to delineate water surfaces. Our theoretical analysis reveals that sensor calibration, the Sun-target-satellite geometry and the atmospheric optical properties create synthetic effects on the satellite's digital number (DN) and, subsequently, on the thresholds for delineation. The DN-based threshold has a significant dependence on the reflectance-based counterpart, which has been proved with multi-temporal Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data for the Poyang Lake region of China. Our results show that a DN-based threshold is generally higher than a reflectance-based one, and similar to 90% of the difference is accounted for by temporal influences. A quantification of the temporal influences provides a physical explanation to the variation in thresholds, and the findings should be valuable for improving the reliability of long-term studies using multi-temporal images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据