4.6 Article

Vegetation activity monitoring as an indicator of eco-hydrological impacts of extreme events in the southeastern USA

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 519-544

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2012.714088

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship
  2. NOAA SARP-WATER grant [NA08OAR4310701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A vegetation disturbance persistence metric based on Moderate-Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer North American Carbon Program vegetation indices (8-day composite at 500 m spatial resolution) was developed with the objective of assessing the eco-hydrological impact of extreme events generally, and hurricanes and tropical cyclones in particular, in the southeastern USA. The metric is based on the relationship between vegetation stress and the persistence of standardized enhanced vegetation index anomalies. The data show that in the first water year (October-September) after hurricane landfall, pronounced decreases in chlorophyll activity are found predominantly at very low elevations - including coastal marshes, wetlands, and the floodplains aligned with drainage networks of major river systems along the storm track. Inland impacts are mainly located in agricultural areas and woody wetlands in the floodplains, and in forested headwater basins in the mountains. Overall, the data analysis indicates that the major impacts of these storms are on agricultural and natural land-margin ecosystems predominantly via flooding associated with the storm surge along the coast, and flood propagation through the river networks inland. The timescale of impacts in coastal areas is up to two years, consistent with persistent impacts of salt intrusion in shallow coastal aquifers, erosion of root zone soils, and depletion of nutrients due to flooding. By contrast, ecological drought disturbance patterns exhibit larger spatial persistence but significantly shorter timescales (3-4 months).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据