4.7 Article

Exon capture phylogenomics: efficacy across scales of divergence

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 1059-1068

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12449

关键词

exon capture; genomics; phylogenetics; phylogenomics; reptiles

资金

  1. ARC Laureate Fellowship [ARC FL110100104]
  2. NIH [S10RR029668, S10RR027303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The evolutionary histories of species are not measured directly, but estimated using genealogies inferred for particular loci. Individual loci can have discordant histories, but in general we expect to infer evolutionary histories more accurately as more of the genome is sampled. High Throughput Sequencing (HTS) is now providing opportunities to incorporate thousands of loci in phylogenomic' studies. Here, we used target enrichment to sequence c.3000 protein-coding exons in a group of Australian skink lizards (crown group age c.80Ma). This method uses synthetic probes to capture' target exons that were identified in the transcriptomes of selected probe design (PD) samples. The target exons are then enriched in sample DNA libraries prior to performing HTS. Our main goal was to study the efficacy of enrichment of targeted loci at different levels of phylogenetic divergence from the PD species. In taxa sharing a common ancestor with PD samples up to c.20Ma, we detected little reduction in efficacy, measured here as sequencing depth of coverage. However, at around 80Myr divergence from the PD species, we observed an approximately two-fold reduction in efficacy. A secondary goal was to develop a workflow for analysing exon capture studies of phylogenetically diverse samples, while minimizing potential bias. Our approach assembles each exon in each sample separately, by first recruiting short sequencing reads having homology to the corresponding protein sequence. In sum, custom exon capture provides a complement to existing, more generic target capture methods and is a practical and robust option across low-moderate levels of phylogenetic divergence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据