4.6 Article

Crop classification using multi-configuration SAR data in the North China Plain

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 170-183

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431161.2011.587844

关键词

-

资金

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX1-YW-09]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41071277]
  3. National Key Technology RD Programme [2008BADA8B02]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Programme of China (863 Programme) [2009AA12Z1462]
  5. ESA [5279]
  6. DLR [LAN0563]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crop classification is a key issue for agricultural monitoring using remote-sensing techniques. Synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data are attractive for crop classification because of their all-weather, all-day imaging capability. The objective of this study is to investigate the capability of SAR data for crop classification in the North China Plain. Multi-temporal Envisat advanced synthetic aperture radar (ASAR) and TerraSAR data were acquired. A support vector machine (SVM) classifier was selected for the classification using different combinations of these SAR data and texture features. The results indicated that multi-configuration SAR data achieved satisfactory classification accuracy (best overall accuracy of 91.83%) in the North China Plain. ASAR performed slightly better than TerraSAR data acquired in the same time span for crop classification, while the combination of two frequencies of SAR data (C- and X-band) was better than the multi-temporal C-band data. Two temporal ASAR data acquired in late jointing and flowering periods achieved sufficient classification accuracy, and adding data to the early jointing period had little effect on improving classification accuracy. In addition, texture features of SAR data were also useful for improving classification accuracy. SAR data have considerable potential for agricultural monitoring and can become a suitable complementary data source to optical data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据