4.6 Article

Parameterization of water component absorption in an inland eutrophic lake and its seasonal variability: a case study in Lake Taihu

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 30, 期 13, 页码 3549-3571

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802581958

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [40571110]
  2. National Science and Technology [2008BAC34B05]
  3. Nanjing Normal University [181200000220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water spectral absorption characteristics of eutrophic lakes are largely different from those of ocean and coastal waters. We therefore studied them with the aim of establishing an analytical model for inland water colour, to be used in remote sensing. Field measurements were carried out on 16 and 17 August 2006 (summer), 5 and 6 November 2006 (winter), and 29 and 30 March 2007 (spring) at 15 stations in northern Lake Taihu (China). Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) absorption coefficients (a CDOM) are higher in summer than in spring and winter, with the ratios of a CDOM in spring, summer and winter being approximately 1:4.0:1.2 at both UV-C and UV-B. The spectral slope S CDOM values change with wavelength and season, and covary with CDOM concentration, as shown by regression analysis. For the CDOM absorption spectrum in the wavelength region 500-700nm (important for water colour remote sensing), a linear method simulates better than an exponential method. Seasonal variations in non-algal particulate (NAP) absorption (a NAP) at blue, green and red wavelengths show better consistency, in the order winterspringsummer. The average S NAP is 0.0065 +/- 0.0009nm-1, which is lower than that in other types of waters. Phytoplankton absorption (a ph) peak height changes with the season, with the pattern summerwinterspring, and phytoplankton absorption spectra can be expressed with high accuracy by a quadratic model. CDOM absorption contributions in the three seasons are low compared to phytoplankton and NAP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据