4.6 Article

Quantifying high-resolution impervious surfaces using spectral mixture analysis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 2915-2932

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01431160802558634

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wisconsin Space Grant Consortium
  2. National Aeronautics Space Administration, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Impervious surface distribution and its temporal changes are considered key urbanization indicators and are utilized for analysing urban growth and influences of urbanization on natural environments. Recently, urban impervious surface information was extracted from medium/coarse resolution remote sensing imagery (e.g. Landsat ETM+ and AVHRR) through spectral analytical methods (e.g. spectral mixture analysis (SMA), regression tree, etc.). Few studies, however, have attempted to generate impervious surface information from high resolution remotely sensed imagery (e.g. IKONOS and Quickbird). High resolution images provide detailed information about urban features and are, therefore, more valuable for urban analysis. The improved spatial resolution, however, also brings new challenges when existing spectral analytical methods are applied. In particular, a higher spatial resolution leads to reduced boundary effects and increased within-class variability. Taking Grafton, Wisconsin, USA as a study site, this paper analyses the spectral characteristics of IKONOS imagery and explores the applicability of SMA for impervious surface estimation. Results suggest that with improved spatial resolution, IKONOS imagery contains 40-50% of mixed urban pixels for the study area, and the within-class variability is a severe problem for spectral analysis. To address this problem, this paper proposes two approaches, interior end-member set selection and spectral normalization, for SMA. Analysis of results indicates that these approaches can reasonably reduce the problems associated with boundary effects and within-class variability, therefore generating better impervious surface estimates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据