4.7 Article

Unexpected cryptic species diversity in the widespread coral Seriatoporahystrix masks spatial-genetic patterns of connectivity

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 24, 期 12, 页码 2993-3008

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13225

关键词

connectivity; coral; cryptic species; population genetics; Seriatopora

资金

  1. AIMS@JCU
  2. Marine & Tropical Sciences Research Facility
  3. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mounting evidence of cryptic species in a wide range of taxa highlights the need for careful analyses of population genetic data sets to unravel within-species diversity from potential interspecies relationships. Here, we use microsatellite loci and hierarchical clustering analysis to investigate cryptic diversity in sympatric and allopatric (separated by 450km) populations of the widespread coral Seriatoporahystrix on the Great Barrier Reef. Structure analyses delimited unique genetic clusters that were confirmed by phylogenetic and extensive population-level analyses. Each of four sympatric yet distinct genetic clusters detected within S.hystrix demonstrated greater genetic cohesion across regional scales than between genetic clusters within regions (<10km). Moreover, the magnitude of genetic differentiation between different clusters (>0.620G(ST)) was similar to the difference between S.hystrix clusters and the congener S.caliendrum (mean G(ST) 0.720). Multiple lines of evidence, including differences in habitat specificity, mitochondrial identity, Symbiodinium associations and morphology, corroborate the nuclear genetic evidence that these distinct clusters constitute different species. Hierarchical clustering analysis combined with more traditional population genetic methods provides a powerful approach for delimiting species and should be regularly applied to ensure that ecological and evolutionary patterns interpreted for single species are not confounded by the presence of cryptic species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据