4.7 Article

Phylogeography of var gene repertoires reveals fine-scale geospatial clustering of Plasmodium falciparum populations in a highly endemic area

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 484-497

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13033

关键词

DBL; genetic diversity; immune evasion; Plasmodium falciparum; population structure; var genes

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) [APP1005653]
  2. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmodium falciparum malaria is a major global health problem that is being targeted for progressive elimination. Knowledge of local disease transmission patterns in endemic countries is critical to these elimination efforts. To investigate fine-scale patterns of malaria transmission, we have compared repertoires of rapidly evolving var genes in a highly endemic area. A total of 3680 high-quality DBL-sequences were obtained from 68 P.falciparum isolates from ten villages spread over two distinct catchment areas on the north coast of Papua New Guinea (PNG). Modelling of the extent of var gene diversity in the two parasite populations predicts more than twice as many var gene alleles circulating within each catchment (Mugil=906; Wosera=1094) than previously recognized in PNG (Amele=369). In addition, there were limited levels of var gene sharing between populations, consistent with local parasite population structure. Phylogeographic analyses demonstrate that while neutrally evolving microsatellite markers identified population structure only at the catchment level, var gene repertoires reveal further fine-scale geospatial clustering of parasite isolates. The clustering of parasite isolates by village in Mugil, but not in Wosera was consistent with the physical and cultural isolation of the human populations in the two catchments. The study highlights the microheterogeneity of P.falciparum transmission in highly endemic areas and demonstrates the potential of var genes as markers of local patterns of parasite population structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据