4.7 Article

Genetically distinct populations of northern shrimp, Pandalus borealis, in the North Atlantic: adaptation to different temperatures as an isolation factor

期刊

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY
卷 24, 期 8, 页码 1742-1757

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/mec.13158

关键词

adaptation; gene flow; marine genetic structure; oceanographic modelling; pelagic larval duration; temperature

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway (POPBOREALIS) [196587/S40]
  2. Interreg IVa program of the EU's European Regional Development Fund
  3. Norwegian Ministry of Fisheries
  4. Nordic Council of Ministers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The large-scale population genetic structure of northern shrimp, Pandalus borealis, was investigated over the species' range in the North Atlantic, identifying multiple genetically distinct groups. Genetic divergence among sample localities varied among 10 microsatellite loci (range: F-ST=-0.0002 to 0.0475) with a highly significant average (F-ST=0.0149; P<0.0001). In contrast, little or no genetic differences were observed among temporal replicates from the same localities (F-ST=0.0004; P=0.33). Spatial genetic patterns were compared to geographic distances, patterns of larval drift obtained through oceanographic modelling, and temperature differences, within a multiple linear regression framework. The best-fit model included all three factors and explained approximately 29% of all spatial genetic divergence. However, geographic distance and larval drift alone had only minor effects (2.5-4.7%) on large-scale genetic differentiation patterns, whereas bottom temperature differences explained most (26%). Larval drift was found to promote genetic homogeneity in parts of the study area with strong currents, but appeared ineffective across large temperature gradients. These findings highlight the breakdown of gene flow in a species with a long pelagic larval phase (up to 3months) and indicate a role for local adaptation to temperature conditions in promoting evolutionary diversification and speciation in the marine environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据