4.7 Article

Safety of 90Y Radioembolization in Patients Who Have Undergone Previous External Beam Radiation Therapy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.041

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Previous external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is theoretically contraindicated for yttrium-90 (Y-90) radioembolization (RE) because the liver has a lifetime tolerance to radiation before becoming vulnerable to radiation-induced liver disease. We analyzed the safety of RE as salvage treatment in patients who had previously undergone EBRT. Methods and Materials: Between June 2004 and December 2010, a total of 31 patients who had previously undergone EBRT were treated with RE. Three-dimensional treatment planning with dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis of the liver was used to calculate the EBRT liver dose. Liver-related toxicities including RE-induced liver disease (REILD) were reviewed and classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.02. Results: The mean EBRT and RE liver doses were 4.40 Gy (range, 0-23.13 Gy) and 57.9 Gy (range, 27.0-125.9 Gy), respectively. Patients who experienced hepatotoxicity (>= grade2; n = 12) had higher EBRT mean liver doses (7.96 +/- 8.55 Gy vs 1.62 +/- 3.39 Gy; P = .037), the only independent predictor in multivariate analysis. DVH analysis showed that the fraction of liver exposed to >= 30 Gy (V30) was the strongest predictor of hepatotoxicity (10.14% +/- 12.75% vs 0.84% +/- 3.24%; P = .006). All patients with V30 >13% experienced hepatotoxicity. Fatal REILD (n = 2) occurred at the 2 highest EBRT mean liver doses (20.9 Gy and 23.1 Gy) but also at the highest cumulative liver doses (91.8 Gy and 149 Gy). Conclusions: Prior exposure of the liver to EBRT may lead to increased liver toxicity after RE treatment, depending on fractional liver exposure and dose level. The V30 was the strongest predictor of toxicity. RE appears to be safe for the treatment of hepatic malignancies only in patients who have had limited hepatic exposure to prior EBRT. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据