4.6 Article

Quercetin Inhibits Multiple Pathways Involved in Interleukin 6 Secretion From Human Lung Fibroblasts and Activity in Bronchial Epithelial Cell Transformation Induced by Benzo[a]Pyrene Diol Epoxide

期刊

MOLECULAR CARCINOGENESIS
卷 55, 期 11, 页码 1858-1866

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mc.22434

关键词

STAT3 transcription factor; NF-kappa B; extracellular signal-regulated MAP kinases; carcinogenesis

资金

  1. NCI/NIH [R03CA167727, R01ES017328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between epithelial and stromal cells through soluble factors such as cytokines plays an important role in carcinogenesis. Breaking this cancer-promoting interaction poses an opportunity for cancer prevention. The tumor-promoting function of interleukin 6 (IL-6) has been documented; however, the underlying mechanisms of this function in lung carcinogenesis are not well elucidated. Here, we show that benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE, the active metabolite of cigarette smoke carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene)-induced human bronchial epithelial cell (HBEC) transformation was enhanced by IL-6 in vitro. The carcinogen/IL-6-transformed cells exhibited higher expression of STAT3 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3) when compared with cells transformed by BPDE alone. Constitutive STAT3 activation drove cell proliferation and survival through anti-apoptosis gene expression. We further show that quercetin, a dietary compound having preventive properties for lung cancer, decreased BPDE-stimulated IL-6 secretion from human lung fibroblasts through inhibition of the NF-kappa B and ERK pathways. The inhibition was accomplished at clinically achievable concentrations of the compound. Finally, quercetin blocked IL-6-induced STAT3 activation in HBECs, and IL-6 enhancement of HBEC transformation by BPDE was abolished by quercetin treatment. Altogether, our data reveal novel mechanisms for IL-6 in lung carcinogenesis and for the preventive role of quercetin in the process. (C) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据