4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

USING F-18-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY TO ESTIMATE THE LENGTH OF GROSS TUMOR IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THE ESOPHAGUS

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.015

关键词

Esophageal carcinoma; Positron emission tomography; Radiotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine the optimal method of using F-18-fiuorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) to estimate gross tumor length in esophageal carcinoma. Methods and Materials: Thirty-six patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radical surgery were enrolled. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated using three different methods: visual interpretation, standardized uptake value (SUV) 2.5, and 40% of maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) on FDG-PET imaging. The length of tumors on PET scan were measured and recorded as Length(vis), Length2.5, and Length(40), respectively, and compared with the length of gross tumor in the resected specimen (Length(gross)). All PET data were reviewed again postoperatively, and the GTV was delineated using various percentages of SUVmax. The optimal-threshold SUV was generated when the length of PET matched the Length(gross). Results: The mean (+/- SD) Length(gross), was 5.48 +/- 1.98 cm. The mean Lengthvis, Length2.5, and Length(40) were 5.18 +/- 1.93 cm, 5.49 +/- 1.79 cm, and 4.34 +/- 1.54 cm, respectively. The mean Length(vis) (p = (0.123) and Length(2.5) (p = 0.957) were not significantly different from Length(gross), and Length2.5 seems more approximate to Length(gross). The mean Length(40) was significantly shorter than Length(gross) (p < 0.001). The mean optimal threshold was 23.81% +/- 11.29% for all tumors, and it was 19.78% +/- 8.59%, 30.92% +/- 12.28% for tumors >= 5 cm, and <5 cm, respectively (p = 0.009). The correlation coefficients of the optimal threshold were -0.802 and -0.561 with SUV,a, and Length(gross), respectively. Conclusions: The optimal PET method to estimate the length of gross tumor varies with tumor length and SUVmax; an SUV cutoff of 2.5 provided the closest estimation in this study. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据