4.6 Article

Antibody Format and Drug Release Rate Determine the Therapeutic Activity of Noninternalizing Antibody-Drug Conjugates

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 14, 期 11, 页码 2606-2612

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-0480

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [670603] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  2. European Research Council [670603] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [163479] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), a promising class of anticancer agents, has traditionally relied on the use of antibodies capable of selective internalization in tumor cells. We have recently shown that also noninternalizing antibodies, coupled to cytotoxic drugs by means of disulfide linkers that can be cleaved in the tumor extracellular environment, can display a potent therapeutic activity. Here, we have compared the tumor-targeting properties, drug release rates, and therapeutic performance of two ADCs, based on the maytansinoid DM1 thiol drug and on the F8 antibody, directed against the alternatively spliced Extra Domain A (EDA) domain of fibronectin. The antibody was used in IgG or in small immune protein (SIP) format. In both cases, DM1 was coupled to unpaired cysteine residues, resulting in a drug-antibody ratio of 2. In biodistribution studies, SIP(F8)-SS-DM1 accumulated in the tumor and cleared from circulation more rapidly than IgG(F8)-SS-DM1. However, the ADC based on the IgG format exhibited a higher tumor uptake at later time points (e.g., 33% IA/g against 8% IA/g at 24 hours after intravenous administration). In mouse plasma, surprisingly, the ADC products in IgG format were substantially more stable compared with the SIP format (half-lives >48 hours and <3 hours at 37 degrees C, respectively), revealing a novel mechanism for the control of disulfide-based drug release rates. Therapy experiments in immunocompetent mice bearing murine F9 tumors revealed that SIP(F8)-SS-DM1 was more efficacious than IgG(F8)-SS-DM1 when the two products were compared either in an equimolar basis or at equal milligram doses. (C) 2015 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据