4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Comparison of target registration errors for multiple image-guided techniques in accelerated partial breast irradiation

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.020

关键词

partial breast irradiation; target registration error; image guidance; surface imaging; X-ray localization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation requires accurate localization of the target volume for each treatment fraction. Using the concept of target registration error (TRE), the performance of several methods of target localization was compared. Methods and Materials: Twelve patients who underwent external beam accelerated partial breast irradiation were included in this study. TRE was quantified for four methods of image guidance: standard laser-based setup, kilo-voltage imaging of the chest wall, kilo-voltage imaging of surgically implanted clips, and three-dimensional surface imaging of the breast. The use of a reference surface created from a free-breathing computed tomography scan and a reference surface directly captured with three-dimensional video imaging were compared. The effects of respiratory motion were also considered, and gating was used for 8 of 12 patients. Results: The median value of the TRE for the laser, chest wall, and clip alignment was 7.1 mm (n = 94), 5.4 mm (n = 81), and 2.4 mm (n = 93), respectively. The median TRE for gated surface imaging based on the first fraction reference surface was 3.2 mm (n = 49), and the TRE for gated surface imaging using the computed tomography-based reference surface was 4.9 mm (n = 56). The TRE for nongated surface imaging using the first fraction reference surface was 6.2 mm (n = 25). Conclusions: The TRE of surface imaging using a reference surface directly captured with three-dimensional video and the TRE for clip-based setup were within 1 mm. Gated capture is important for surface imaging to reduce the effects of respiratory motion in accelerated partial breast irradiation. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据