4.5 Article

Transcriptomic profiling suggests a role for IGFBP5 in premature senescence of endothelial cells after chronic low dose rate irradiation

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
卷 90, 期 7, 页码 560-574

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2014.905724

关键词

Gene expression; endothelial cells; chronic low dose rate ionizing radiation; senescence

资金

  1. EU FP7 DoReMi [249689]
  2. EU FP7 Procardio project [295823]
  3. Federal Agency of Nuclear Control (FANC-AFCN, Belgium) [CO-90-13-3289-00]
  4. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority
  5. doctoral SCK.CEN/Ghent University grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Ionizing radiation has been recognized to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD). However, there is no consensus concerning the dose-risk relationship for low radiation doses and a mechanistic understanding of low dose effects is needed. Material and methods: Previously, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were exposed to chronic low dose rate radiation (1.4 and 4.1 mGy/h) during one, three and six weeks which resulted in premature senescence in cells exposed to 4.1 mGy/h. To gain more insight into the underlying signaling pathways, we analyzed gene expression changes in these cells using microarray technology. The obtained data were analyzed in a dual approach, combining single gene expression analysis and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis. Results: An early stress response was observed after one week of exposure to 4.1 mGy/h which was replaced by a more inflammation-related expression profile after three weeks and onwards. This early stress response may trigger the radiation-induced premature senescence previously observed in HUVEC irradiated with 4.1 mGy/h. A dedicated analysis pointed to the involvement of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 5 (IGFBP5) signaling in radiation-induced premature senescence. Conclusion: Our findings motivate further research on the shape of the dose-response and the dose rate effect for radiation-induced vascular senescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据