4.7 Article

Pancreas-specific activation of mTOR and loss of p53 induce tumors reminiscent of acinar cell carcinoma

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER
卷 14, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BIOMED CENTRAL LTD
DOI: 10.1186/s12943-015-0483-1

关键词

Pancreatic cancer; p53; mTOR; ACC; Organ involution; Tissue homeostasis

资金

  1. TU Munich commission for clinical research [KKF C21-11]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [MI 1173/5-1]
  3. European Union (FP7, PacaNet)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) is a rare tumor entity with an unfavorable prognosis. Recent whole-exome sequencing identified p53 mutations in a subset of human ACC. Activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway is associated with various pancreatic neoplasms. We thus aimed at analyzing whether activation of mTOR with a concomitant loss of p53 may initiate ACC. Methods: We generated transgenic mouse models in which mTOR was hyperactivated through pancreas-specific, homozygous tuberous sclerosis 1 (Tsc1) deficiency, with or without deletion of p53 (Tsc1(-/-) and Tsc1(-/-); p53(-/-)). Activity of mTOR signaling was investigated using mouse tissues and isolated murine cell lines. Human ACC specimens were used to corroborate the findings from the transgenic mouse models. Results: Hyperactive mTOR signaling in Tsc1(-/-) mice was not oncogenic but rather induced a near-complete loss of the pancreatic acinar compartment. Acinar cells were lost as a result of apoptosis which was associated with p53 activation. Concomitantly, ductal cells were enriched. Ablation of p53 in Tsc1-deficient mice prevented acinar cell death but promoted formation of acinar cells with severe nuclear abnormalities. One out of seven Tsc1(-/-); p53(-/-) animals developed pancreatic tumors showing a distinctive tumor morphology, reminiscent of human ACC. Hyperactive mTOR signaling was also detected in a subset of human ACC. Conclusion: Hyperactive mTOR signaling combined with loss of p53 in mice induces tumors similar to human ACC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据