4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Effects of simultaneous EEG recording on MRI data quality at 1.5, 3 and 7 tesla

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
卷 67, 期 3, 页码 178-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.06.008

关键词

electroencephalography; functional magnetic resonance imaging; MR image artefacts; field homogeneity

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G9900259] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. MRC [G9900259] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G9900259] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although the focus of attention on data degradation during simultaneous MRI/EEG recording has to date largely been upon EEG artefacts, the presence of the conducting wires and electrodes of the EEG recording system also causes some degradation of MRI data quality. This may result from magnetic susceptibility effects which lead to signal drop-out and image distortion, as well as the perturbation of the radiofrequency fields, which can cause local signal changes and a global reduction in the signal to noise ratio (SNR) of magnetic resonance images. Here, we quantify the effect of commercially available 32 and 64 electrode caps on the quality of MR images obtained in scanners operating at magnetic fields of 1.5, 3 and 7 T, via the use of MR-based, field-mapping techniques and analysis of the SNR in echo planar image time series. The electrodes are shown to be the dominant source of magnetic field inhomogeneity, although the localised nature of the field perturbation that they produce means that the effect on the signal intensity from the brain is not significant. In the particular EEG caps investigated here, RF inhomogeneity linked to the longer ECG and EOG leads causes some reduction in the signal intensity in images obtained at 3 and 7 T. Measurements of the standard deviation of white matter signal in EPI time series indicates that the introduction of the EEG cap produces a small reduction in the image signal to noise ratio, which increases with the number of electrodes used. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据