4.2 Article

COMPARISON OF CONSECUTIVE PERIODS OF 1-, 2-, AND 3-YEAR MORTALITY OF GERIATRIC INPATIENTS WITH DELIRIUM, DEMENTIA, AND DEPRESSION IN A CONSULTATION-LIAISON SERVICE

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.2190/PM.45.1.d

关键词

delirium; dementia; depression; elderly; mortality; psychiatric consultation

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital in Taiwan [CMRPG690491, CMRPG 690492]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Dementia, depression, and delirium are the most prevalent psychiatric disorders in elderly medical inpatients and are all associated with higher mortality. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare consecutive periods of 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality among elderly patients with dementia, depression, and delirium seen by a psychiatry consultation-liaison service in a general hospital. Methods: We consecutively enrolled inpatients 65 years of age and older that were referred for psychiatric consultation (N = 614) from 2002 to 2006: 172 were diagnosed with delirium, 92 with dementia, and 165 with depression. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality rates for the three groups of patients were compared by log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to identify any possible factors associated with mortality during the study period. Results: Only 1-year mortality in the delirium group was significantly higher than that in the depression group (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference among the three groups in 2- and 3-year mortality. In terms of gender, higher mortality was identified only in depressed male patients. Furthermore, male, older age, and longer length of hospital stay, but not multiple physical comorbidities, were associated with higher mortality. Conclusion: Clinical physicians should give special attention to delirious patients within the first year after referral. Patients at risk for mortality should be closely followed and early intervention provided in an effort to decrease or delay mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据