4.1 Article

The influence of switching from risperidone to paliperidone on the extrapyramidal symptoms and cognitive function in elderly patients with schizophrenia: A preliminary open-label trial

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/13651501.2013.845218

关键词

Paliperidone; extrapyramidal symptoms; working memory; elderly schizophrenia; risperidone

资金

  1. Yoshitomiyakuhin
  2. GlaxoSmithKline
  3. Dainippon Sumitomo
  4. Pfizer
  5. Meiji Seika
  6. Janssen
  7. Mitsubishi Tanabe
  8. Otsuka
  9. Tokai University School of Medicine
  10. Eisai
  11. Lilly
  12. Astellas

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. This study was to evaluate the effects on clinical symptoms and cognitive function of switching the treatment of elderly patients with schizophrenia from risperidone to paliperidone (PAL). Methods. This study was a 12-weeks, preliminary open-label trial. The subjects were 17 inpatients. Their extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) were assessed using the Drug-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS), and Barnes Akathisia Scale (BAS), and their cognitive function was assessed using the Brief Assessment Cognition in Schizophrenia: Japanese language version (BACS-J), and their clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and Clinical Global Impression-Severity of illness scale (CGI-S) at the 0 and 12 weeks. Results. The DIEPSS and BAS significantly improved aft er switching from risperidone to PAL. Furthermore, improvement was found on AIMS. The mean change from baseline in z-score of the digit sequencing task was significantly increased. All items on the PANSS and CGI-S were not significant; however, changes in some cognitive function were correlated with changes in EPS. Conclusions. The results of this study suggest the possibility that switching elderly patients from risperidone to PAL may have improved preexisting EPS, and may also have helped improve working memory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据