4.7 Review

Effects of managerial ties and trust on supply chain information sharing and supplier opportunism

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 23, 页码 7046-7061

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2014.932931

关键词

trust; marketing-operations interface; China; supply chain management; supply chain information sharing

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [70971042, 71172075, 71371006, 71090403, 71131003]
  2. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-13-0219]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130172110029]
  4. Key Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research of Ministry of Education [12JZD042]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, SCUT [2013ZZ0093, x2gsD2133310]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Managerial ties and trust are important factors in facilitating collaboration and reducing opportunistic behaviour. There is, however, a lack of empirical evidence on how these relational factors influence the sharing of information among supply chain partners. For example, do stronger managerial ties help to improve supply chain information sharing (SCIS) and reduce supplier opportunism? To what extent SCIS is influenced by managerial ties and trust? How do managerial ties interact with trust in influencing SCIS? Using data from 272 Chinese manufacturers, this paper examines the impact of managerial ties and trust on SCIS and supplier opportunism. The results show that, through trust managerial ties can significantly influence the extent of information sharing and the quality of the information shared. Managerial ties also have a direct impact on the extent of information sharing, but not on the quality of the information shared. The main implication for management practice is that the quality of the information shared - rather than the extent of information sharing - should be seen as the main leverage in reducing supplier opportunism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据