4.6 Article

Estimating the cost of vertical high-speed machining centres, a comparison between multiple regression analysis and the neural networks approach

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2008.05.009

关键词

cost model; neural networks; multiple regression analysis; high-speed machining

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper focuses on the machine-toot selection problem, which consists of choosing the most suitable machine to satisfy the needs of a manufacturing company. The final decision affects the performance of the production system. Selecting an inadequate machine can negatively affect the company's results. For this reason, this is an important process that may imply some difficulties for the decision-maker. The objective of this work was to develop a cost model for vertical high-speed machining (HSM) centres based on machine characteristics. It is important to determine the cost of the machine tool, which is based on the tool's characteristics and needs to satisfy both the buyer and the manufacturer. In order to determine the main machine specifications associated with machine cost, a preliminary analysis was conducted with entry-level vertical HSM centres. As a result, two models were developed: one from the buyer's point of view and the other from the manufacturer's point of view. The cost estimation models were developed using two different techniques: multiple regression analysis (MRA) and artificial neural networks (ANN). The paper then examines the performance of the models, and compares the models' outputs to determine which model offers the best results. Cost estimation is important to determine the machine costs that adapt best to the characteristics of manufacturing factories. The correlation obtained by the multilayer ANN models is better than the one obtained by MRA. Applying the proposed cost models will help the user (engineers or machine manufacturers) to determine the approximate machine cost based on its characteristics when they select a vertical HSM centre. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据