4.7 Article

Interface dislocation patterns and dislocation nucleation in face-centered-cubic and body-centered-cubic bicrystal interfaces

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLASTICITY
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 40-55

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2013.07.002

关键词

Interface; Dislocation; Frank-Bilby; Atomistic simulation

资金

  1. Center for Materials at Irradiation and Mechanical Extremes, an Energy Frontier Research Center
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [2008LANL1026]
  3. LDRD [ER20140450, DR20110029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanolayered metallic composites exhibit unusual high strength at the layer thickness in nanometers. Plastic deformation including nucleation, glide, and transmission of dislocations is strongly related to interface structure and properties. Combining atomistic simulations with the classical Frank-Bilby theory, we studied dislocation structures of semicoherent interfaces between face-centered-cubic (fcc) and body-centered-cubic (bcc) crystals. An atomically informed Frank-Bilby theory is proposed for quantitative analysis of interface dislocations. The results showed that (1) seven sets of interface dislocations are present in the Nishiyama-Wasserman (NW) interface and two sets of interface dislocation in the Kurdjumov-Sachs (KS) interface although they are misoriented by only similar to 5.6 degrees; (2) Burgers vectors of interface dislocations can be well defined in a commensurate/coherent dichromatic pattern (CDP) lattice corresponding to the NW interface and the Rotation CDP (RCDP) lattice corresponding to the KS interface; (3) the CDP and RCDP lattices are not simply a geometric average of the two natural lattices; finally we demonstrated that (4) the nucleation of dislocations, including interface dislocation loops corresponding to interface sliding and lattice dislocation loops corresponding to plastic deformation in crystals, are strongly correlated with interface dislocation patterns. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据