4.4 Article

PALEOECOLOGICAL AND PHYLOGENETIC IMPLICATIONS OF SAXICAULIS MECKERTII GEN. ET SP. NOV.: A BENNETTITALEAN STEM FROM THE UPPER CRETACEOUS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES
卷 171, 期 8, 页码 915-925

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/655963

关键词

Bennettitales; borer; Cretaceous; oribatid mites; plant-animal interactions

资金

  1. NSF [EF-0629819]
  2. NSERC [A-6908]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new anatomically preserved bennettitalean stem has been recovered from the Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian) Eden Main locality on Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada. The fossil, described as Saxicaulis meckertii gen. et sp. nov., is permineralized and consists of a eustelic stem with diverging non-girdling leaf traces, a narrow zone of dense wood, primary cortex, and adventitious roots. Important vegetative characters that differentiate bennettitalean stems from cycad stems are reviewed, and while the anatomy of the stem conforms to Bennettitales, it is not consistent with either the Williamsoniaceae or the Cycadeoidaceae as they are currently understood. This fossil documents greater structural diversity among Cretaceous bennettitaleans than previously known and tentatively documents an additional growth habit (underground stem). Co-occurring fossils and plant structure suggest this plant may have inhabited an environment prone to fires. Additionally, there is evidence for two forms of plant-animal interaction in the fossil. The first is a large gallery in the pith lined with wound reaction tissue and accessed through a 3-mm hole on the surface of the stem that represents a new type of herbivore damage for Bennettitales. Reaction tissue occurs in rings and plates throughout the plant body. Smaller galleries containing coprolites of oribatid mites and lacking wound reaction tissue are present in the cortex. The complexity of Upper Cretaceous bennettitalean plant-animal interactions through herbivory and detritivory is evaluated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据