4.4 Article

EVOLUTION OF THE MATING SYSTEM IN A PARTIALLY SELF-INCOMPATIBLE SPECIES: REPRODUCTIVE ASSURANCE AND POLLEN LIMITATION IN POPULATIONS THAT DIFFER IN THE TIMING OF SELF-COMPATIBILITY

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES
卷 170, 期 7, 页码 885-893

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/600133

关键词

delayed selfing; mixed mating; pollen limitation; reproductive assurance; self-compatibility

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [0212903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-fertilization can provide reproductive assurance during periods of low or unreliable pollinator visitation. Therefore, periods of low pollen receipt may favor evolutionary shifts from cross-fertilization to self-fertilization. Although reproductive assurance is hypothesized to be important in mating system evolution, it has been quantified in relatively few species. Leptosiphon jepsonii shows variation in the mode of selfing, with transient self-incompatibility conferring delayed selfing seen in some individuals and early self-compatibility present in others. Autofertility, reproductive assurance, and pollen limitation were quantified in three populations of L. jepsonii that vary in the timing of self-compatibility and rate of self-fertilization. Plants in all three populations were capable of high seed set through autonomous self-fertilization, and selfing provided significant reproductive assurance in two populations, including one with the highest frequency of delayed selfing. Confidence intervals revealed no difference in reproductive assurance among populations. We conclude that both early and delayed self-compatibility can confer reproductive assurance and alleviate pollen limitation in this species. Results from this study are integrated with previous studies on the same three populations. We synthesize data on inbreeding depression, outcrossing rates, and floral biology for a comprehensive evaluation of the factors affecting the evolution of mixed mating in L. jepsonii.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据