4.4 Article

Coniferous ovulate cones from the Lower Cretaceous of Santa Cruz Province, Argentina

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES
卷 169, 期 6, 页码 799-813

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/533608

关键词

Argentina; Cheirolepidiaceae; conifers; Kachaike formation; Lower Cretaceous; ovulate cones; Patagonia; taxodiaceous Cupressaceae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two types of coniferous ovulate cones borne on leafy twigs are described from the Lower Cretaceous Kachaike Formation in Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. The fossils are impressions and compressions with well-preserved cuticles. Morphology, anatomy, and ultrastructure were studied using LM, SEM, and TEM. Ovulate cones were assigned to Athrotaxis ungeri (Halle) Florin of the taxodiaceous Cupressaceae and Kachaikestrobus acuminatus gen. et sp. nov. of the Cheirolepidiaceae. This latter taxon is characterized by terminal elongate cones borne on twigs with Brachyphyllum leaves, cone scales densely and helically disposed, broad bracts with an accentuated acuminate apex fused at their bases to eight-lobed ovuliferous dwarf shoots shorter than the bracts, and an epimatium covering at least one ovule that has preserved only the outer integument and the megaspore membrane. The ultrastructure of the bract and ovuliferous dwarf shoot cuticle is composed of three layers. Comparisons of K. acuminatus with other cheirolepidiaceous ovulate cones showed closest resemblance to Hirmeriella muensteri (Schenk) Jung. These Patagonian cone scales appear to have some of the most ancestral characters in the family. By the early Albian, A. ungeri and K. acuminatus were part of a plant assemblage dominated by ferns and a few subordinate angiosperms. The finding of A. ungeri in the Kachaike Formation extends its distribution during the Lower Cretaceous in Patagonia. These fossils also show that at that time, the taxodiaceaous Cupressaceae and the Cheirolepidiaceae still were well represented in southern South America.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据