4.5 Article

ADAPTATION OF A CONSTRUCTED WETLAND TO SIMULTANEOUS TREATMENT OF MONOCHLOROBENZENE AND PERCHLOROETHENE

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 998-1013

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2010.549860

关键词

phytoremediation; chlorinated solvents; groundwater-surface water interface; reductive dechlorination; microbial degradation

资金

  1. DBU Deutsche Bundesstiftung Umwelt [AZ 20006/824]
  2. Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Graduate School for Environmental Research (HIGRADE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mixed groundwater contaminations by chlorinated volatile organic compounds (VOC) cause environmental hazards if contaminated groundwater discharges into surface waters and river floodplains. Constructed wetlands (CW) or engineered natural wetlands provide a promising technology for the protection of sensitive water bodies. We adapted a constructed wetland able to treat monochlorobenzene (MCB) contaminated groundwater to a mixture of MCB and tetrachloroethene (PCE), representing low and high chlorinated model VOC. Simultaneous treatment of both compounds was efficient after an adaptation time of 21/2 years. Removal of MCB was temporarily impaired by PCE addition, but after adaptation a MCB concentration decrease of up to 64% (55.3 mu mol L-1) was observed. Oxygen availability in the rhizosphere was relatively low, leading to sub-optimal MCB elimination but providing also appropriate conditions for PCE dechlorination. PCE and metabolites concentration patterns indicated a very slow system adaptation. However, under steady state conditions complete removal of PCE inflow concentrations of 10-15 mu mol L-1 was achieved with negligible concentrations of chlorinated metabolites in the outflow. Recovery of total dechlorination metabolite loads corresponding to 100%, and ethene loads corresponding to 30% of the PCE inflow load provided evidence for complete reductive dechlorination, corroborated by the detection of Dehalococcoides sp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据