4.5 Article

PHYTOEXTRACTION OF METAL POLLUTED SOILS AROUND A Pb-Zn MINE BY CROP PLANTS

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 360-384

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226510802565568

关键词

metal polluted soils; phytoextraction; lead; copper; zinc; metal phytoavailability; BCR sequential extraction

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [REN2003-04788/ TECNO]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Environment [1.2-089/2005/3-B, 097/20062-1.2]
  3. Government of Castilla-La Mancha [PREG-05-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to assess their practical capability for the absorption and accumulation of Pb, Zn, and Cu, five common crop plants, i.e. maize (Zea mays), sunflower (Helianthus annuus), canola (Brassica napus), barley (Hordeum vulgare) and White lupine (Lupinus albus) were tested in pot experiments using six soil samples taken from mine tailings, pasture and arable soils around an old Pb-Zn mine in Spain. Metal concentration ranges of the soils were 76.2-785 mg kg(-1), 127-1652 mg kg(-1), and 12.4-82.6 mg kg(-1) for Zn, Pb, and Cu, respectively. With the exception of the highest polluted sample, soil total metal concentration did not influence significantly biomass yields of each crop for the different growth substrates. The order found for the total metal accumulation rate (TMAR) in the crops was Zn>> Pb > Cu, with maize reaching the highest metal concentrations. Pb root concentrations were markedly higher than those of shoots for all the crops, while Zn and Cu were translocated to shoots more efficiently. Concentrations of metals extracted by EDTA and BCR sequential extraction were well correlated, in general, with both root metal content and TMAR. CaCl2-extracted Zn was well correlated with root concentrations, TMAR and, in some cases, with shoot contents. Our study showed that the test crops were not feasible to remediate the heavily or moderately contaminated soils studied here in order to achieve the total metal soil concentrations required by the current European laws.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据