4.7 Article

On the correlation of output rate and aerodynamic characteristics in vibrating-mesh-based aqueous aerosol delivery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 461, 期 1-2, 页码 34-37

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.11.036

关键词

Aerodynamic diameter; Aerosol coagulation; Output rate; Pulmonary drug delivery; Vibrating mesh nebulizer

资金

  1. Universitatsklinikum Giessen und Marburg [1/2012 GI]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aerosolization of aqueous formulations is of special interest for inhalative drug delivery, where an adequate nebulizer performance represents a prerequisite for improving pulmonary therapy. The present study investigated the interplay of output rate and aerodynamic characteristics of different excipientbased formulations and its impact on the atomization process by vibrating-mesh technology (i.e. eFlow rapid). Output rate and aerodynamic characteristics were manipulated by both dynamic viscosity and conductivity of the applied formulation. Supplementation with sucrose and sodium chloride caused a decline (down to 0.2 g/min) and elevation (up to 1.0 g/min) of the nebulizer output rate, respectively. However, both excipients were capable of decreasing the aerodynamic diameter of produced aerosol droplets from >7.0 pm to values of <5.0 pm. Thus, the correlation of output rate and aerodynamic characteristics resulted in linear fits of opposite slopes (R2 >0.85). Finally, the overall number of delivered aerosol droplets per time was almost constant for sucrose (<1 x 108 droplets/s), while for sodium chloride a concentration-dependent increase was observed (up to 3 x 108 droplets/s). Overall, the current findings illustrated the influence of formulation parameters on the aerosolization process performed by vibrating-mesh technology. Moreover, concentration and charge distribution of aerosol populations supposedly modify the final characteristics of the delivered aerosols. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据