4.7 Article

Non-covalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes with modified polyethyleneimines for efficient gene delivery

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 454, 期 1, 页码 204-215

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.06.057

关键词

Single-walled carbon nanotubes; Polyethyleneimine; Gene delivery; Non-viral vector; In vivo

资金

  1. Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
  2. Iran Nanotechnology Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been recently emerged as important class of vectors for delivery of DNA and other biomolecules into various cells. In this study, single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) were functionalized by non-covalent binding of hydrophobic moieties, which were covalently linked to polyethyleneimines (PEIs). PEls of three molecular weights (25, 10 and 1.8 kDa) were used. CNTs were functionalized with the PEI series either through phospholipid moiety (via a polyethyleneglycol linker) or through directly-attached long (18 carbons) or intermediate (10 carbons) hydrophobic alkyl moieties. All PEI-functionalized CNTs exhibited good stability and dispersibility in biological media. Visualizing of functionalized CNTs and lack of aggregation were confirmed by atomic force microscopy. The PEI derivatives bound to CNTs retained the ability to fully condense plasmid DNA at low NIP ratios and substantial buffering capacity in the endosomal pH range. PEI-functionalized CNTs exhibited increased transfection efficiency compared to underivatized PEIs up to 19-fold increase being observed in the functionalized CNT with the smallest PEI tested, the smallest hydrophobic attachment moiety tested and no linker. Also PEI-functionalized CNTs were effective gene delivery vectors in vivo following tail vein injection in mice with the largest expression occurring with the vector PEI-functionalized through a polyethyleneglycol linker. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据