4.7 Article

The role of lipid geometry in designing liposomes for the solubilisation of poorly water soluble drugs

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 453, 期 1, 页码 225-232

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.056

关键词

Liposomes; Low soluble drugs; Bilayer drug loading; Solubilisation; Monolayer studies

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S61287/01]
  2. Aston University International Student Scholarship
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/S61287/01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liposomes are well recognised for their ability to improve the delivery of a range of drugs. More commonly they are applied for the delivery of water-soluble drugs, but given their structural attributes, they can also be employed as solubilising agents for low solubility drugs as well as drug targeting agents. To further explore the potential of liposomes as solubilising agents, we have investigated the role of bilayer packaging in promoting drug solubilisation in liposome bilayers. The effect of alkyl chain length and symmetry was investigated to consider if using 'mis-matched' phospholipids could create 'voids' within the bilayers, and enhance bilayer loading capacity. Lipid packing was investigated using Langmuir studies, which demonstrated that increasing the alkyl chain length enhanced lipid packing, with condensed monolayers forming, whilst asymmetric lipids formed less condensed monolayers. However, this more open packing did not translate into improved drug loading, with the longer chain, condensed bilayers formed from long-chain, saturated lipids offering higher drug loading capacity. These studies demonstrate that liposomes formulated from longer chain, saturated lipids offer enhanced solubilisation capacity. However the molecular size, rather than lipophilicity, of the drug to be incorporated was also a key factor dominating bilayer incorporation efficiency. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据