4.7 Article

Enhanced uptake and cytotoxity of folate-conjugated mitoxantrone-loaded micelles via receptor up-regulation by dexamethasone

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 448, 期 1, 页码 142-149

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.03.032

关键词

Lipid-core micelles; Folate targeting; Receptor up-regulation; Endocytosis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90923042, 31170917, 31271023]
  2. PUMC Youth Fund [2012D08]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Folate conjugated amphiphilic polymeric micelles have attracted much attention for active targeted delivery of drugs in folate receptor alpha (FR-alpha) positive tumors. However, the efficacy improvement of targeted delivery folate-based nanovehicles was limited by the abundance of FR-alpha on the surface of tumor cells. Recently, it was found that FR-alpha expression of Hela cells could be up-regulated by modulators such as dexamethasone, which open a new avenue to enhance the efficiency of targeted delivery from the biological view. In this study, folate-conjugated or plain lipid-core micelles loaded with fluorescent coumarin 6 or mitoxantrone (MTN) were prepared by self-assembly. In addition, FOLR1 mRNA and cell surface FR-alpha levels were evaluated in Hela cells with dexamethasone treatment. The endocytosis of folate-conjugated or plain micelles loaded with coumarin 6 was examined with confocal microscopy and flow cytometry, which displayed that folate-conjugated micelles can be internalized more efficiently in dexamethasonetreated Hela cells than in normal Hela cells. Moreover, the antitumor activity of folate-conjugated micellar MTN was also improved through up-regulation of FR-alpha. Therefore, FR-alpha up-regulation using modulators has great potential to improve the therapeutic efficacy of folate-conjugated nanovehicles in some FR-alpha positive tumors via receptor-mediated endocytosis. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据