4.7 Article

99mTc-labelled nanosystem as tumour imaging agent for SPECT and SPECT/CT modalities

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 449, 期 1-2, 页码 10-17

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.03.049

关键词

Nanoparticles; Folate-targeted; Radiolabeled; Tc-99m; SPECT; SPECT/CT; In vivo

资金

  1. Hungarian National Development Agency [GOP-1.1.1-07/1-2008-0082, OTKA-68376, JEDIONKO, KMOP-1.1.1-08/1-2008-0017, GOP-1.1.1.-09/1-2010-0107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report the synthesis, in vitro and in vivo investigation of folate-targeted, biocompatible, biodegradable self-assembled nanoparticles radiolabelled with Tc-99m, as potential new SPECT or SPECT/CT imaging agent. Nanoparticles with hydrodynamic size in the range of 75-200 nm were prepared by self-assembly of chitosan and folated poly-gamma-glutamic acid, and then radiolabelled with Tc-99m. The nanoparticles target tumour cells overexpressing folate receptors and internalize specifically into them to realize early tumour diagnosis detected by SPECT and SPECT/CT modalities. Rat hepatocellular carcinoma cells were used as model system. Cell specificity and tumour targeting efficacy of these nanosystems were investigated in vitro, and in vivo using SPECT and fusion nanoSPECT/CT imaging. In vitro results showed that the radiolabeled nanosystem was efficiently internalized by tumour cells. Whole-body biodistribution of the new radiolabelled, folate-targeted nanoparticles revealed higher uptake in the tumorous kidney compared to the non-tumorous contralateral side. Uptake by the lungs and thyroids was negligible, which confirmed the stability of the nanoparticles in vivo. In vivo SPECT and SPECT/CT imaging visually reinforced the uptake results and were in accordance with the biodistribution data: the new nanoparticles as a targeted contrast agent improve tumour targeting and are able to detect folate-receptor-overexpressing tumours in animal models with enhanced contrast. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据