4.7 Article

Formulation, characterization and pharmacokinetics of Morin hydrate niosomes prepared from various non-ionic surfactants

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 456, 期 2, 页码 446-458

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.040

关键词

Morin hydrate; Niosomes; Orthogonal array; Drug delivery; Pharmacokinetics; Molecular modeling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973649, 30901867, 81102817, 81202929]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20090096110002, 20110096110005]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China [CX10B-373Z]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [JKQ2011016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Morin hydrate (MH), a bioflavonoid with antioxidant and anticancer activity as well as the ability to improve the bioavailability of other drugs on their concurrent use. Three differently optimized niosomal formulations using three different non-ionic surfactants (Span 60, Span 80 and Tween 60) were achieved by (L-9 (3(4))) Taguchi orthogonal array (TOA). The analysis of TOA revealed that Tween 60 Niosomes had the highest entrapment efficiency (93.4%) compared to other optimized Niosomal formulations (71-79%). In terms of MH remaining %, Tween 60 Niosomes were found to be the most stable (89%) at 4 degrees C over one month compared to Span 60(56%) and Span 80(57%) Niosomes. The release pattern in all Niosomal formulations was found to follow the Weibull model and Tween 60 Niosomes had the highest release rate. The molecular modeling simulation explained the binding of MH to the human serum albumin (HSA) by hydrogen bonds during the in vitro release process. As for the bioavailability, the AUC(0-8) showed 1.3-2.7 fold increase compared to the MH solution. Ex vivo images of the excised organs showed that MH could accumulate in brain which indicates that MH-Tween 60 Niosomes might be a possible candidate to deliver hydrophobic drugs and overcome the blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据