4.7 Article

Tablet preformulations of indomethacin-loaded mesoporous silicon microparticles

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 422, 期 1-2, 页码 125-131

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.10.040

关键词

Mesoporous silicon; Microparticles; Poorly soluble drug; Indomethacin; Tablet formulation; Dissolution rate

资金

  1. Boehringer-Ingelheim, Germany
  2. Academy of Finland [127099, 252215, 256394]
  3. University of Helsinki [490039]
  4. Academy of Finland (AKA) [127099, 127099] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, indomethacin-loaded thermally oxidized mesoporous silicon microparticles (TOPSi-IMC) were formulated into tablets with excipients in order to improve the dissolution and permeability properties of the poorly soluble drug. Formulations of TOPSi-IMC particles and excipients were prepared at different TOPSi-IMC particle ratios (25, 30 and 35%). The formulations were compressed by direct compression technique with a single punch tablet machine. For comparison, a formulation containing the bulk IMC (indomethacin) and the same excipients without thermally oxidized mesoporous silicon microparticles particles (TOPSi) was prepared and compressed into tablets. The TOPSi-IMC tablets were characterised according to weight, thickness, crushing strength, disintegration time and dissolution rate. The results of this study show that TOPSi-IMC particles can be compressed to a conventional tablet. The release rate of the drug and its permeation across intestinal cells model (Caco-2) from TOPSi-IMC tablets was improved compared to the bulk IMC tablets. The dissolution rate and permeability of IMC from the tablets decreased with increasing ratio of the TOPSi-IMC particles in the formulation. The phenomenon is, presumably, a result of the loss of unique pore structure of the particles due to deformation of the particles under the compression load. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据