4.7 Article

Intracellular delivery of redox cycler-doxorubicin to the mitochondria of cancer cell by folate receptor targeted mitocancerotropic liposomes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 432, 期 1-2, 页码 63-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.030

关键词

Redox cycler; Mitochondrial delivery; Anticancer therapy; Mitocancerotropic liposomes; ROS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer cells reflect higher level of ROS in comparison to the normal cell, so they become more vulnerable to further oxidative stress induced by exogenous ROS-generating agents. Through this a novel therapeutic strategy has evolved, which involves the delivery of redox cycler-doxorubicin (DOX) to the mitochondria of cancer cell where it acts as a source of exogenous ROS production. The purpose of this study is to develop a liposomal preparation which exhibits a propensity to selectively target cancer cell along with the potential of delivering drug to mitochondria of cell. We have rendered liposomes mitocancerotropic (FA-MTLs) by their surface modification with dual ligands, folic acid (FA) for cancer cell targeting and triphenylphosphonium (TPP) cations for mitochondria targeting. The cytotoxicity, ROS production and cell uptake of doxorubicin loaded liposomes were evaluated in FR (+) KB cells and found to be increased considerably with FA-MTLs in comparison to folic acid appended, mitochondria targeted and non-targeted liposomes. As confirmed by confocal microscopy, the STPP appended liposomes delivered DOX to mitochondria of cancer cell and also showed higher ROS production and cytotoxicity in comparison to folic acid appended and non-targeted liposomes. Most importantly, mitocancerotropic liposomes showed superior activity over mitochondria targeted liposomes which confirm the synergistic effect imparted by the presence of dual ligands - folic acid and TPP on the enhancement of cellular and mitochondrial delivery of doxorubicin in KB cells. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据