4.7 Article

Development of a mucoadhesive nanoparticulate drug delivery system for a targeted drug release in the bladder

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 416, 期 1, 页码 339-345

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.06.033

关键词

Nanoparticles; Mucoadhesion; Trimethoprim; Urinary bladder; Interstitial cystitis; Sustained-release preparation; Intravesical drug delivery system

资金

  1. Nano-Health project as part of the Austrian Nano-Initiative [0200]
  2. Austrian FFG (Forschungsforderungsgesellschaft mbH) [819721]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: Purpose of the present study was the development of a mucoadhesive nanoparticulate drug delivery system for local use in intravesical therapy of interstitial cystitis, since only a small fraction of drug actually reaches the affected site by conventional treatment of bladder diseases via systemic administration. Methods: Chitosan-thioglycolic acid (chitosan-TGA) nanoparticles (NP) and unmodified chitosan NP were formed via ionic gelation with tripolyphosphate (TPP).Trimethoprim (TMP) was incorporated during the preparation process of NP. Thereafter, the mucoadhesive properties of NP were determined in porcine urinary bladders and the release of TMP among simulated conditions with artificial urine was evaluated. Results: The particles size ranged from 183 nm to 266 nm with a positive zeta potential of +7 to +13 mV. Under optimized conditions the encapsulation efficiency of TMP was 37%. The adhesion of prehydrated chitosan-TGA NP on the urinary bladder mucosa under continuous urine voiding was 14-fold higher in comparison to unmodified chitosan NP. Release studies indicated a more sustained IMP release from covalently cross linked particles in comparison to unmodified chitosan-TPP NP over a period of 3 h in artificial urine at 37 degrees C. Conclusion: Utilizing the method described here, chitosan-TGA NP might be a useful tool for local intravesical drug delivery in the urinary bladder. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据