4.7 Article

Self-assembly nanoparticles for the delivery of bisphosphonates into tumors

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 403, 期 1-2, 页码 292-297

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.10.046

关键词

Zoledronic acid; Self-assembly nanoparticles; Calcium phosphate; Cationic liposomes

资金

  1. Regione Campania-Laboratori Pubblici Hauteville
  2. MIUR-PRIN
  3. Italian Association for Cancer Research (AIRC)
  4. Ministero della Salute
  5. Italian Foundation for Cancer Research (FIRC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphosphonates (BPs) are molecules able to induce apoptosis in several cancer cell lines. However, their short half-life and the rapid uptake and accumulation within bone, limit its use as antitumor agent for extra-skeletal malignancies. Here we proposed a new delivery system to avoid BP accumulation into the bone, thus improving extra-skeletal bioavailability. In this work, we used the zoledronic acid (ZOL), a third generation bisphosphonate, able to induce apoptosis at micromolar concentration. We developed ZOL-containing self-assembly PEGylated nanoparticles (NPs) based on ZOL complexes with calcium phosphate NPs (CaPZ NPs) and cationic liposomes. PEGylation was achieved by two different strategies. CaPZ NPs were covered with PEGylated liposomes (pre-PLCaPZ NPs); alternatively, CaPZ NPs were previously mixed with cationic liposomes and then PEGylated by post-insertion method (post-PLCaPZ NPs). The NPs were fully characterized in terms of mean diameter and size distribution, morphology, ZOL loading, antiproliferative effect on different cell lines. Pre-PLCaPZ NPs showed the best technological characteristics, with a narrow size distribution and a high ZOL loading. Moreover, on different cancer cell lines, these NPs enhanced the antiproliferative effect of ZOL Finally, in an animal model of prostate cancer, a significant reduction of tumor growth was achieved with pre-PLCaPZ NPs, while the tumor was unaffected by ZOL in solution. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据