4.7 Article

Multi-equilibrium system based on sertraline and β-cyclodextrin supramolecular complex in aqueous solution

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 421, 期 1, 页码 24-33

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.09.026

关键词

Sertraline; beta-Cyclodextrin; Inclusion compound; Theoretical calculations; Physical-chemical parameters; Multi-equilibrium

资金

  1. Brazilian agency CAPES
  2. Brazilian agency CNPq
  3. Brazilian agency FAPEMIG
  4. Brazilian agency INCT-NanoBiofar
  5. Chemistry Department from Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sertraline (SRT) is a widely used antidepressant whose poor solubility in water limits its oral applicability. Thus, the aim of this work was the evaluation of a multi-equilibrium system based on beta-cyclodextrin (beta CD) and SRT. The inclusion compounds (ICs) were investigated by infrared spectroscopy, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) and H-1 and 2D ROESY nuclear magnetic resonance experiments. SRT solubility was predicted in vitro in water and biomimetic fluids. The SRT in presence of beta CD at 1:1 and 1:2 molar ratios was more soluble than free SRT in all biomimetics media investigated. The FTIR-HATR showed that beta CD nu C-O-C stretching band was reduced in presence of SRT, suggesting the interactions between them. Additionally, titration process and Job's plot provided information on the ICs stoichiometry and evidenced the multi-equilibrium coexistence in aqueous solution. According to the ITC, SRT:beta CD interaction process was spontaneous and exothermic with a high affinity binding constant (K = 14,726 M-1). Additionally, the stoichiometry coefficient (n) was 1.63, which was comparable to that found by FITR-HATR. The H-1 and 2D ROESY verified multiple SRT sites included into the host cavity. Theoretical calculations depicted the relative energy of different proposed ICs structures, in which the 1:2 IC was the most stable. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据