4.7 Article

Solubility enhancement of hydrophobic compounds by cosolvents: Role of solute hydrophobicity on the solubilization effect

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 393, 期 1-2, 页码 48-54

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.03.059

关键词

Cosolvency; Polarity; Hydrophobicity; Log-linear model; Non-ideality; Solubility

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drug solubilization is an important aspect of drug development. We investigate the relationship between solute hydrophobicity on the solubilization properties of water-cosolvent mixtures. The solubilization in water-cosolvent mixtures of seven chemically unrelated drugs was determined. The set of solutes included hydrocortisone, sulfanilamide, acetophenetidine, benzocaine, indomethacin, thymol and ibuprofen. Two sets of water-cosolvent mixtures were used in the study. A group of polar cosolvents consisting of three aliphatic alcohols, and a group of the less polar cosolvents NMP, tetraglycol and labrasol. The hydrophobicity of the drug has a direct impact on the solubilization obtained in the water-cosolvent mixtures. However, the role of hydrophobicity is different in the case of the polar cosolvents compared with the less polar ones. In polar cosolvents, the solubilization behavior is typical of polarity match, where the collective trend of solubility enhancement decreases as the activity coefficient of the solute in the solvent mixture increases. The result is a linear profile comprising the combined data of all solutes and all solvents. On the other hand, while the less polar cosolvents exhibit greater positive deviations from the log-linear cosolvency model, the collective solubility enhancement in these systems exhibits no readily discernible pattern. However, by taking into account the hydrophobicity of the solutes, a systematic effect becomes clearly apparent. In this case, the hydrophobicity of the solute demarcates its region in the solubilization profile. (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据