4.7 Article

Relevance of the colloidal stability of chitosan/PLGA nanoparticles on their cytotoxicity profile

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 381, 期 2, 页码 130-139

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.04.049

关键词

PLGA nanoparticles; Chitosan; Cytotoxicity; Colloidal properties; MTT assay; LDH assay; In vitro tests

资金

  1. Deutsche Krebshilfe [10-2035-K1 I]
  2. Robert Bosch Foundation (Stuttgart, Germany)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of nanoparticles on a sub-cellular level necessitates an in depth study of their biocompatibility. However, complete characterization of the particles under the physiological conditions relevant for biological evaluation is still lacking. Our goal is therefore to evaluate the possible toxicity aspects of chitosan-modified PLGA nanoparticles on different cell lines and relate them to the parameters affecting the colloidal stability of the nanoparticles. The impacts of different factors such as nanoparticle concentration, exposure time. chitosan content in the particles and pH fluctuations on the cell viability were investigated. Meanwhile. the colloidal stability of the particles in cell culture media was checked by measuring their size and charge as well as visualizing the particles in media by scanning force microscopy (SFM). A slight shift in the pH of the culture medium to the acidic side allows the protonation of chitosan; thus the increased positive surface charge induced membrane damage (similar to 50% increase in LDH released). Besides, cell viability is reduced by 15% in the absence of serum; serum in the culture medium forms a protective shell around the particles; such interaction influences the surface charge of the particles and was found to be a function of chitosan content in the particles. In conclusion, there is an undeniable impact of cell type, medium, presence/absence of serum on the colloidal state of the particles that consequently influence their interaction with the cells. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据