4.7 Article

Poly(ethylene glycol) layered silicate nanocomposites for retarded drug release prepared by hot-melt extrusion

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 363, 期 1-2, 页码 126-131

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.06.027

关键词

Poly(ethylene glycol)(PEG); Nanocomposites; Drug delivery systems; Hot-melt extrusion; Layered silicates; Nanoclays

资金

  1. Invest Northern Ireland under the Proof of Concept Scheme (POC-39)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composites of paracetamol loaded poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) with a naturally derived and partially synthetic layered silicate (nanoclay) were prepared using hot-melt extrusion. The extent of dispersion and distribution of the paracetamol and nanoclay in the PEG matrix was examined using a combination of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD). The paracetamol polymorph was shown to be well dispersed in the PEG matrix and the nanocomposite to have a predominately intercalated and partially exfoliated morphology. The form I monoclinic polymorph of the paracetamol was unaltered after the melt mixing process. The crystalline behaviour of the PEG on addition of both paracetamol and nanoclay was investigated using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and polarised hot-stage optical microscopy. The crystalline content of PEG decreased by up to 20% when both drug and nanoclay were melt blended with PEG, but the average PEG spherulite size increased by a factor of 4. The time taken for 100% release of paracetamol from the PEG matrix and corresponding diffusion coefficients were significantly retarded on addition of low loadings of both naturally occurring and partially synthetic nanoclays. The dispersed layered silicate platelets encase the paracetamol molecules, retarding diffusion and altering the dissolution behaviour of the drug molecule in the PEG matrix. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据