4.7 Article

Evaluation of self-dissolving needles containing low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in rats

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 349, 期 1-2, 页码 124-129

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.07.036

关键词

low molecular weight heparin; self-dissolving needles; percutaneous administration; pharmacological availability; anticoagulant; rats

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Feasibility study of self-dissolving needles containing polysaccharide was performed. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was used as a representative polysaccharide. Using chondroitin, dextran and dextrin as the base, self-dissolving needles (SDN) were prepared. The obtained SDNs were evaluated in rat absorption experiment, where pharmacological availability (PA) was calculated by comparing the plasma anti-Xa activity vs. time curves between SDNs and i.v. solution. After the insertion of SDNs to rats skin where the doses of LMWH were 25, 50 and 1001U/kg, plasma samples were collected for 6 h and anti-Xa activity was measured as the pharmacological index of LMWH. The anti-Xa level was maintained above 0.2 IU/ml, the therapeutic level, for about 2 h at a dose of 100 IU/kg. Almost the same PAs of LMWH were obtained with dextran and dextrin SDNs, 97.7% and 102.3%, though lower PA was obtained with chondroitin SDN, 81.5%. In vitro dissolution experiment showed that LMWH was released from dextran, dextrin and chondroitin SDNs within 10 min. The T(50%)s were 0.84 +/- 0.06 min for dextran SDN, 1.07 +/- 0.12 min for chondroitin SDN and 2.11 +/- 0.31 min for dextrin SDN, respectively. Plasma anti-Xa activity vs. time profiles showed good dose-dependency in the 25-100 IU/kg range and high PAs were obtained, 90.0% for 25 IU/kg, 95.4% for 50 IU/kg and 97.7% for 100 lU/kg from dextran SDNs. Stability experiment was performed with dextran SDNs for 3 months. Above 97% of LMWH were remained in SDNs under three different conditions, -80, 4 and 40 degrees C. These results suggest the usefulness of SDN to polysaccharide drug. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据