3.9 Article

Increased oxidative stress and altered substrate metabolism in obese children

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/17477160903545163

关键词

Dyslipidemia; inflammation; oxidative stress; childhood obesity

资金

  1. NIH [M01-RR00827-28, K-23 RR018661-01]
  2. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [K23RR018661, M01RR000827] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [K24DK085223] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Pediatric obesity, a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes, has steadily increased in the last decades. Although excessive inflammation and oxidation are possible biochemical links between obesity and cardiovascular events in adults, little information is available in children. Furthermore, effects of gender and fitness on the interaction between dyslipidemia and oxidative/inflammatory stress in children are mostly unknown. Methods. Therefore, we measured systemic markers of oxidation (F(2)-isoprostanes [F(2)-IsoP] and antioxidants) and inflammation (interleukin-6 [IL-6] and leukocyte counts) and metabolic variables in 113 peripubertal children (55 obese [Ob] age and gender-adjusted BMI%>= 95(th), 25 Females [F]; 15 overweight [OW] BMI% 85(th)-95(th), 8 F; 43 normoweight [NW] 25 F). Results. When compared with NW, Ob displayed elevated F(2)-IsoP (99+/-7 vs. 75+/-4 pg/mL, p<0.005), IL-6 (2.2+/-0.2 vs. 1.5+/-0.3 pg/mL, p<0.005), elevated total leukocytes and neutrophils, altered levels of total cholesterol, low- and high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids, glucose, and insulin (all p<0.005). This pattern was present in both genders and over a broad range of fitness in Ob. Conclusions. Our data indicate that alterations in metabolic control and a concomitant increase in inflammation and oxidative stress occur early in life in obese children, likely exposing both genders to a similar degree of increased risk of future cardiovascular diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据