4.5 Article

Limits of agreement method for comparing TSD and FWD measurements

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2013.782403

关键词

accuracy; pavement deflection; limits of agreement; reproducibility; continuous measurement

资金

  1. Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) [R06(F)]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article uses the limits of agreement (LOA) method to compare the falling weight deflectometer (FWD) and the traffic speed deflectometer (TSD), two pavement structural evaluation devices. The TSD measures deflection slope, whereas the FWD measures deflection. For this reason, measurements were converted to the surface curvature index (SCI) and the base damage index (BDI), which can be obtained from each device. The SCI and BDI agreement between the two devices was then evaluated. Although the relationship between the calculated SCI and BDI using both equipments is reasonably close to the line of equality, there is a significant variation and a bias in this relationship. For example, for an average SCI or BDI value of 300 mu m, the bias was 30 mu m (FWD values lower than TSD values), and the LOA was 380 mu m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据