4.6 Article

Downregulation of microRNA-431 by human interferon-β inhibits viability of medulloblastoma and glioblastoma cells via upregulation of SOCS6

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 44, 期 5, 页码 1685-1690

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2317

关键词

microRNA; human IFN-beta; JAK-STAT signaling pathway; cell viability; cancer therapy

类别

资金

  1. Smoking Research Foundation
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI [24701002]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24701002, 23501269] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

miRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that inhibit gene expression by cleaving or hindering the translation of target mRNAs. In this study, we focused on miR-431, which mediated inhibition of cell viability by human interferon-beta (HuIFN-beta). We aimed to demonstrate an antineoplastic effect of HuIFN-beta via miR-431 expression against medulloblastoma and glioblastoma, because HuIFN-beta is frequently used in adjuvant therapy of these tumors. Addition of HuIFN-beta to medulloblastoma and glioblastoma cells reduced viability, significantly decreased miR-431 expression, upregulated expression of SOCS6 (putative miR-431 target genes) and inhibited Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) 2. The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, but not the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)-Akt pathway, was downregulated in medulloblastoma cells, whereas the PI3K-Akt pathway, but not the MAPK pathway, was downregulated in glioblastoma cells. Addition of HuIFN-beta and transient transfection with miR-431 to medulloblastoma and glioblastoma cells did not reduce viability, downregulated expression of SOCS6, and concomitantly activated the JAK1 and STAT2. We propose that, in medulloblastoma and glioblastoma cells, HuIFN-beta decreases miR-431 expression and upregulates SOCS6 expression, and consequently inhibit cell proliferation by suppressing the JAK-STAT signaling pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据