4.6 Article

MicroRNA-148a is silenced by hypermethylation and interacts with DNA methyltransferase 1 in hepatocellular carcinogenesis

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
卷 44, 期 6, 页码 1915-1922

出版社

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2373

关键词

hepatocellular carcinoma; miR-148a; DNA methylation; DNMT1

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81072686, 81273526, 81202978]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In general, microRNAs, a class of small (similar to 21 nucleotide) non-coding RNAs, negatively regulate the expression of their target genes. Dysregulation of miRNAs is a common feature in human cancers, but this phenomenon has not been studied extensively in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). miR-148a, a member of the miR-148/152 family, has been found to be downregulated in several tumor types and has been suggested to be a tumor suppressor gene; however, its function in HCC remains unclear. Herein, we describe the epigenetic regulation of miR-148a and its impact on HCC cells. We found that, due to the hypermethylation of its CpG island, miR-148a undergoes methylation-mediated silencing in HCC cell lines. Additionally, DNMT1, the DNA methyltransferase that maintains methylation patterns, is aberrantly upregulated in HCC cell lines, and its overexpression is responsible for hypermethylation of the miR-148a promoter. Intriguingly, the expression of DNMT1, which is a target of miR-148a, is inversely correlated with the expression of miR-148a in HCC cells. These results lead us to propose the existence of a negative feedback regulatory loop between miR-148a and DNMT1 in HCC. Importantly, we demonstrate that the overexpression of miR-148a significantly inhibits HCC cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. Our results suggest the existence of a novel miR-148a-DNMT1 regulatory circuit and indicate that miR-148a acts as a tumor suppressor during hepatocellular carcinogenesis. These results may provide a promising alterative strategy for the therapeutic treatment of HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据